Sermon 39 — Every good gift and every perfect gift comes down from the Father of lights
Ich habe ein wort für geleit in latîne, daz schrîbet uns mîn herre sant Jacob in der epistel unde sprichet ‘alliu gift diu beste unde gâbe vollebrâht diu ist nider vallende von enboben von dem vater der liehte. Bî dem enist kein wandelunge noch kein schatwe zîtlich.’ Disiu zwei wort, daz er sprichet ‘alliu gift diu beste unde gâbe vollebrâht’, sprechent unser meister, daz sie tragen underscheit. Daz wortelîn ‘gift’ vellet in zît; daz wortelî ‘gâbe’ denket der zît niht. Gift suochet alle wege daz ir an den dingen, aber gâbe ist frî unde blôz und alzemâle lôs alles warumbe. Daz heizet gâbe, daz niht enmeinet dan lûter willekeit. Dar umbe ist gâbe alzemâle frî. Gâbe ist daz, daz friunt gebe ist, ob man ez niemer gegêbe, daz ez doch in ime selber ein gâbe ist. Sprechent unser meister, alse verre als sie tragent minne, sô ist ez eine gâbe; aber gift diu ist als ein koufman unde hât alle wege warumbe. Ein heilige sprichet: bluot des heiligen geistes unde sîn glimmen ist ein wîse êwig, ein ander wîse zîtlich. Wêre mîn antlütze êwig unde hielt ez für einen spiegel, sô würde ez enpfangen in dem spiegel zîtlich unde wêre doch êwig in ime selber. Der heilige geist hât sîn glimmen. Daz êwig glimmen heizet ein gâbe an sîner êwigen blüete; swâ ime diu sêle wirdig ist, daz si enpfenclîch ist, iz wirt ein gift. Er wil sprechen, daz beide zîtlich, die in uns zîtlich ist, daz ist in ime selber êwic. Got wil uns niht aleine geben gift, er wil uns geben gâbe, diu der heilige geist selber ist. Dar umbe sprichet er ‘alliu gift diu beste unde gâbe vollebrâht diu kumet von oben her nider von dem vater der liehte.’
In eim andern sinne dunket mich des, wie er meinde, daz gâbe mac heizen der heilige geist, wan ez blôz würket in der vernunft. Aber swanne ez ûz brichet in üebunge ûzerlîcher werke, diu doch gotlich ist, oder noch in eime gedanc, sô ist ez gift. Aber gâbe heizet ez in dem, daz diu sêle in got lebet unde von gote in eime liehte und in eime gesmacke blîbet înhangende unde ûfhangende in einer lûterkeit des liehtes unbewegelich. Dar umbe sprichet sant Paulus ‘iu sol smecken, daz dâ enoben ist. der heilige geist ist gâbe, dâ ir inne belîbet in der lûterkeit des liehtes.’ Nû sprichet er ‘iu sol smecken diu dinc, diu enoben sint, niht diu enoben der erde sint. Swenne diu sêle hanget in eime lûtern liehte vernünftikeit, sô smacket si der dinge diu oben sint. Unser meister sprechent: waz lîphaftic ist daz heizet materie. Sprechen wir, daz daz lieht vernünftikeit fliuhet materie, aleine si in sich aller dinge beroubet sî, si hât doch eine mügelicheit, ein noch zuo der materie. Nû sprichet er ‘iu sol smecken diu dinc, diu oben sint’; niht diu oben der erde sint. Sprechen wir: alse verre ez verret von materie, alsô verre ist ez lûter verstentnüsse. Wenne mîn ouge in eime liehte ruochet die grâwe varwe von der want, sô bekenne ich. Wêre dâ gegen vernünftikeit, sô sêhe ich nie mê. Sprechen wir: ein ander kraft tritet verre von materie. Alse wie? Habe ich einen menschen gesehen vor zweinzic jâren, ist er joch tôt, ich nime ein glîchnisse sînes bildes, als er vor mir stê. Diu kraft darf der materie niht, aber doch sô hât si einen gebresten, daz si nimet von materie als in eime bilde. Aber sprechen wir, daz daz lieht vernünftikeit fliuhet, daz ein noch ist oder ein mügelicheit hât ze materie. Swenne diu sêle blîbet in got hangende in eime vernünftigen liehte, sô enhât si niht der materie gegenwertikeit noch gelîchnisse noch kein mügelicheit. Dar umbe sprichet er ‘alliu gift diu beste und gâbe vollebrâht diu kumet von enboben von dem vater der liehte.’
Every best gift and every perfect giving descends from the Father of lights (James 1:17). I have placed before you a word in Latin, written for us by my lord Saint James in his epistle, who says: “Every best gift and perfect giving comes down from above, from the Father of lights, in whom there is neither change nor any temporal shadow.” Our masters say that the two words, “every best gift and perfect giving,” carry a distinction. The little word “gift” falls within time, but the word “giving” takes no account of time. A gift seeks in every way what belongs to it in things, but giving is free and bare and wholly released from every why. Giving is what intends nothing but pure willing. Therefore giving is altogether free. Giving is that which a friend gives, even if he were never to give it, for in itself it is nevertheless a giving. Our masters say that insofar as they bear love, it is a giving; but a gift is like a merchant and always has a why. A saint says that the blood of the Holy Spirit and his shining are eternal in one mode and temporal in another. If my face were eternal and I held it before a mirror, it would be received in the mirror temporally, while nevertheless remaining eternal in itself. The Holy Spirit has his shining. This eternal shining is called a giving in his eternal blossoming; wherever the soul is worthy of him and receptive, it becomes a gift. He means that what is temporal in us is, in itself, eternal in him. God wishes to give us not only a gift but also the giving that is the Holy Spirit himself. Therefore he says: “Every best gift and perfect giving comes down from above, from the Father of lights.”
In another sense, it seems to me that he means that the Holy Spirit can be called giving when he works purely in the intellect. But when this breaks forth into the practice of outward works, which nevertheless is divine, or even into a thought, it is a gift. It is called giving, however, when the soul lives in God and remains attached to him, and held up by him, in a light and in a savor, unmoved in the purity of that light. Therefore Saint Paul says: “You should savor what is above. The Holy Spirit is giving, in which you remain within the purity of the light.” Now he says: “You should savor the things that are above, not those that are above the earth.” When the soul is suspended in the pure light of the intellect, she savors the things that are above. Our masters say that what is bodily is called matter. Suppose we say that the light of the intellect flees matter. Although in itself it is stripped of all things, it nevertheless has a possibility, a certain relation to matter. Now he says: “You should savor the things that are above,” not the things upon the earth. We say that the further it withdraws from matter, the more purely it is understanding. When my eye, in a certain light, perceives the grey color of the wall, I know it. If the intellect were set against it, I would never see it again. We may say that another power withdraws far from matter. How so? If I saw a person twenty years ago, even if he is dead, I can summon a likeness of his image, as though he stood before me. That power has no need of matter, yet it has this deficiency: it takes something from matter in the form of an image. But we say that the light of the intellect flees even the remaining possibility or potential for matter. When the soul remains suspended in God in an intellectual light, she has neither the presence of matter nor a likeness of it nor any possibility of it. Therefore he says: “Every best gift and perfect giving comes from above, from the Father of lights.”