Tractate — Chapter 14
Sant Johannes sprichet ‘ich sach daz wort in gote.’ Got daz ist ein lûter wesen, ein lûter verstentnisse unde verstêt sich selbe in im selben. Nû meinet sant Johannes, daz der sun ist in dem vater in der nâtûre. ‘Ich sach daz wort bî gote.’ Dâ meinet er, daz verstentnisse, daz êwiclich in got vlôz, daz vlôz ûz got in ein underscheit der persône, daz ist der sun. ‘Ich sach daz wort vor gote.’ Daz ist, daz der sun êwiclich geborn wirt von dem vater unt daz er ist ein bilde des vater. In dem worte ist niht denne daz wort, daz ist, daz alle crêatûre in dem worte êwicliche ûz gevlozzen sint. ‘Ich sach daz wort under gote.’ Daz ist, daz der sun mensche worden ist, wan got sprach ‘ich hân iuch gewunnen in dem widerscheine mîns vinsternisses.’ Gotes vinsternüsse daz ist sîn nâtûre, die nieman bekennen mac. Guote liute bekennent ir niht, noch dehein crêatûre mac ir niht bekennen; dar umbe ist ez ein vinsternüsse. Dô got vlôz in sîn selbes vinsternüsse, dô was der sun sîn underscheit. Der vater vlôz persônlich in dem vinsternisse sîner nâtûre, alsô verre als er gebar. Der vater gebar sînen sun unde gab im sîne nâtûre, sîner persône gab er im niht: sîne nâtûre gît er wol enwec, sîne persône mac er nieman geben durch des willen, wan ir daz ungeborne wesen nâch volget. Der vater sprach sich und alle crêatûre in sîme sune; der vater sprach sich selben allen crêatûren in sîme sune. Dâ der vater wider kêret in sich selben, dâ sprichet er sich selben in ime selben; dâ vliuzet er wider in sich selben mit allen crêatûren. Her ûf sprichet Dionysius: got ist ûz geflozzen in sich selben, daz ist, daz verborgen nâtûre im genüeget, diu allen crêatûren verborgen ist. Diu sêle enkan im niht gevoigen in sîne nâtûre, ern habe sî denne genzlîche in sich gezogen, daz si in ime vervinstert sî alles geschafens liehtes. Der crêatûre vinsternüsse ist, daz sie unbegrîfenlich sint in ir einveltigen nâtûre und ouch in dem nihte, dâ sie abe geschaffen sint. Des sol si in dem ungeschaffenen liehte bekennen die ungeschaffenheit. In sîne ungeschaffenheit vliuzet si in dem widerscheine sîner vinsternisse.
Eyâ, guot, redet der vater unde der sun unde der heilig geist mit einer rede in der gotheit, oder hât ieglicher eine sunder rede? In der gotheit ist niht denne ein rede; dâ mite redet der vater in der gotheit in daz ungeborne wesen und in daz geborne wesen unde der vater vliuzet in sînen sun mit allem dem, daz er ist, unde der sun redet mit der selben rede. Der vater unde der sun vliezent in den heiligen geist unde der heilig geist redet mit der selben rede. Sie redent in dem wesenne mit einer einvaltigen rede und ir ieglicher redet in sîner persône mit einer rede unde sie redent in ir selbes nâtûre daz diu wârheit ist unde die persône enpfâhent daz wesen weselich als ez ist. Doch enpfâhet diu ein persône von der andern. Sie neigent sich wider in daz wesen mit lobe unde redent lop in daz wesen unde daz ungeborne wesen redet mit sîner ungebornen rede in die persône unde redet der persône lop, daz die persône daz wesen alsô genzlîche enpfâhent, daz diu ein ez der andern für baz gît. Daz ungeborne wesen genüeget ime selben âne geburt und âne werc. In den persônen ist geburt unde werc. Die persône redent, daz sie die wârheit sîn unt daz alle crêatûre der wârheit niht enhaben. Als diu sêle in dise götlîche rede kumt, sô redet si die selben wârheit unde diu gotheit ist einer ieglicher crêatûre als si ir selber ist. Daz kumet von irre einvaltikeit, unde diu crêatûre stêt dâ inne ûf swie si wil. Dar umbe sint die bœsen bœse unde die guoten guot, unde die persône haltent die gerehtikeit in der gotheit. Dar umbe gebent sie den bœsen daz ir unde den guoten daz ir.
Saint John says, ‘I saw the Word in God.’ God is a pure being, a pure understanding, and understands himself in himself. Saint John means that the Son is in the Father in nature. ‘I saw the Word by God.’ By this he means that the understanding which eternally flowed in God flowed out from God into a distinction of person: that is the Son. ‘I saw the Word before God.’ That is, the Son is eternally born from the Father and is an image of the Father. In the Word there is nothing but the Word; that is, all creatures have eternally flowed out in the Word. ‘I saw the Word under God.’ That is, the Son became man, for God said: ‘I have won you in the reflection of my darkness.’ God's darkness is his nature, which no one can know. Good people do not know it, nor can any creature know it; therefore it is a darkness. When God flowed into his own darkness, the Son was his distinction. The Father flowed personally in the darkness of his nature insofar as he begot. The Father begot his Son and gave him his nature; he did not give him his person. He can indeed give away his nature, but he can give his person to no one, because the unbegotten being follows upon it. The Father spoke himself and all creatures in his Son; the Father spoke himself to all creatures in his Son. When the Father turns back into himself, there he speaks himself within himself; there he flows back into himself with all creatures. Saint Dionysius says concerning this: God has flowed out into himself; that is, the hidden nature suffices him, which is hidden from all creatures. The soul cannot follow him into his nature unless he has drawn her wholly into himself, so that in him all created light is darkened for her. The darkness of creatures is that they are incomprehensible in their onefold nature and also in the nothing from which they were created. Therefore in the uncreated light she should know uncreatedness. Into his uncreatedness she flows in the reflection of his darkness.
Ah, then: do the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit speak with one speech in the Godhead, or does each have a separate speech? In the Godhead there is nothing but one speech; with it the Father speaks in the Godhead into the unbegotten being and into the begotten being, and the Father flows into his Son with all that he is, and the Son speaks with the same speech. The Father and the Son flow into the Holy Spirit, and the Holy Spirit speaks with the same speech. In being they speak with one onefold speech, and each speaks in his person with one speech; and in their own nature they speak that which is truth, and the persons receive being essentially as it is. Yet one person receives from the other. They incline themselves back into being with praise and speak praise into being, and the unbegotten being speaks with its unbegotten speech into the persons and speaks praise of the persons, because the persons receive being so completely that one gives it onward to the other. The unbegotten being is sufficient unto itself without birth and without work. In the persons there are birth and work. The persons speak that they are the truth and that all creatures do not possess the truth. When the soul comes into this divine speech, she speaks the same truth, and the Godhead is as present to each creature as it is to itself. This comes from its onefoldness, and the creature stands therein according as it wills. Therefore the evil are evil and the good are good, and the persons uphold righteousness in the Godhead. Therefore they give the evil what belongs to them and the good what belongs to them.